Performance on temp table inserts

From: Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Performance on temp table inserts
Date: 2003-05-19 19:11:48
Message-ID: baba9i$2vi8$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

What factors affect the performance of a temp table insert? On nearly
identical boxes, I have recorded these kinds of statistics:

"INSERT INTO temp_link_checksums VALUES (?)","25957","0.009","245.546"

(That's the statement text, the number of executions, the average, and
the total wallclock time.)

"INSERT INTO temp_link_checksums VALUES (?)","76962","0.041","3184.835"

Box #1 is our "production" server, and actually has more going on during
the day than #2 which is the "test" server. #1 has "shared_buffers" set
to 131072; #2 has it at 250000. Hardware, O/S and PostgreSQL versions are
all identical. Software executing the query (Perl code using DBI) is the
same.

I don't have stats on std-dev for these results; I suppose there could be
an outlying value in the #2 box that dragged down the average. But before
I re-instrument my statistics-gathering code, I thought I'd check to see
if anyone knows how temp tables and shared memory might interact.

--
Jeff Boes vox 269.226.9550 ext 24
Database Engineer fax 269.349.9076
Nexcerpt, Inc. http://www.nexcerpt.com
...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-05-19 19:19:27 Re: "deadlock detected" documentation
Previous Message Jeffrey Pogodzinski 2003-05-19 17:55:23 libpq program SELECT FOR UPDATE and TIMEOUT or CANCEL REQUEST