Re: Performance on temp table inserts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance on temp table inserts
Date: 2003-05-20 04:51:46
Message-ID: 26320.1053406306@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com> writes:
> What factors affect the performance of a temp table insert?

PG version would have a lot to do with that, considering how we've
whacked around the temp-table implementation in the last few releases.

> Hardware, O/S and PostgreSQL versions are all identical.

And they are?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rado Petrik 2003-05-20 09:32:05 Drop CONSTRAINT
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-05-20 01:01:43 Re: "deadlock detected" / cascading locks