Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Date: 2024-11-18 21:30:48
Message-ID: ZzuyCHLuDq0O8DyN@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Nov-04, Erik Wienhold wrote:
>
> > I think Bruce's suggestion is pretty clear that it does not mean line or
> > block comments, but rather the COMMENT command. But I also think that
> > "SQL" in front of the command name is unnecessary [...]
>
> +1 for "Do not dump COMMENT commands", which is what I think you're
> saying.

Patch applied to master.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Pegoraro 2024-11-18 21:36:45 Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-11-18 21:16:09 Re: UUID v7