| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion |
| Date: | 2024-11-05 09:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | 202411050912.getghdvbobdn@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Nov-04, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I think Bruce's suggestion is pretty clear that it does not mean line or
> block comments, but rather the COMMENT command. But I also think that
> "SQL" in front of the command name is unnecessary [...]
+1 for "Do not dump COMMENT commands", which is what I think you're
saying.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de espanto,
sólo le suma el nuevo terror de la locura" (Perelandra, C.S. Lewis)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2024-11-05 09:14:02 | Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-11-05 09:08:17 | Re: Doc: typo in config.sgml |