Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: 2024-10-03 01:59:13
Message-ID: Zv36cbgluA_oZPYq@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Attached is
> the remaining piece.

And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wenhui qiu 2024-10-03 02:07:52 Re: bgwrite process is too lazy
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-10-03 01:20:17 Re: Enhance create subscription reference manual