Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: 2024-09-19 04:08:33
Message-ID: ZuujwbHFor1zLufJ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 08:06:19AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I did not notice this one. I have to admit that the error message
> consistency is welcome, not the extra checks required at
> transformation.

I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Attached is
the remaining piece.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0002-Remove-support-for-ALTER-TABLE-.-SET-UN-LOGGED-on.patch text/x-diff 6.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2024-09-19 04:10:12 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-09-19 03:55:15 Re: Using per-transaction memory contexts for storing decoded tuples