From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Detailed release notes |
Date: | 2024-09-16 19:18:31 |
Message-ID: | ZuiEh_O2TYO1agfi@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 03:42:22PM -0300, Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
> Em seg., 16 de set. de 2024 às 15:15, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> escreveu:
>
> > > I changed the patch to use the section symbol "§" instead of showing
> > > the hashes. The hashes seemed too detailed. Does anyone see a better
> > > symbol to use from here
>
>
> Well, I think section symbol is not a good choice for all commit links
>
> Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) § § § §
> Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) 1 2 3 4
> Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) Commit 1 2 3 4
>
> I don't know which one is better, but I don't think the section symbol is the
> best.
We could try:
Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) §1 §2 §3 §4
and maybe only add numbers if there is more than one commit.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-09-16 19:44:54 | Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-09-16 19:13:47 | Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree |