| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Detailed release notes |
| Date: | 2024-09-16 18:42:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwYkW6QSmg_bGBYjRZ_XdtR3q=Sce+zOKHgi1n2DBOFAHw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 16 de set. de 2024 às 15:15, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
escreveu:
> > > I changed the patch to use the section symbol "§" instead of showing
> > > the hashes. The hashes seemed too detailed. Does anyone see a better
> > > symbol to use from here
Well, I think section symbol is not a good choice for all commit links
Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) § § § §
Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) 1 2 3 4
Add backend support for injection points (Michael Paquier) Commit 1 2 3 4
I don't know which one is better, but I don't think the section symbol is
the best.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2024-09-16 18:43:12 | Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-09-16 18:15:34 | Re: Detailed release notes |