Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-08-22 00:31:21
Message-ID: ZsaG2a-FIw1Y-M6-@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:48:38AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 8/21/24 09:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Is anything -- other than this inquiry -- preventing this patch set from
>> getting committed?
>
> The overwhelming consensus seemed to be "just do it", so FWIW consider my
> reservations withdrawn ;-)

Just do it :)

I am pretty sure that Daniel is just on vacations and that this will
happen sooner than later during the next commit fest, so I'd rather
wait for him for an update on this thread first.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-08-22 00:53:19 Re: ANALYZE ONLY
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-08-22 00:29:30 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration