| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-08-22 21:13:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA41E81A-B5AA-45AC-9322-DEC2655F215D@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 22 Aug 2024, at 02:31, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:48:38AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 8/21/24 09:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Is anything -- other than this inquiry -- preventing this patch set from
>>> getting committed?
That, and available time.
>> The overwhelming consensus seemed to be "just do it", so FWIW consider my
>> reservations withdrawn ;-)
>
> Just do it :)
That's my plan, I wanted to wait a bit to see if anyone else chimed in with
concerns.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2024-08-22 22:14:20 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
| Previous Message | Rafia Sabih | 2024-08-22 20:17:13 | Re: Redundant Result node |