| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-08-21 14:48:38 |
| Message-ID: | 0bddec20-fba0-481a-89b2-f4388aa79102@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/21/24 09:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 07.08.24 15:49, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 5 Aug 2024, at 15:36, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> It would not shock me to see complaints from others after we rip out support
>>> for 1.0.2, but maybe not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>
>>
>> I think it's highly likely that we will see complaints for any support we
>> deprecate. OpenSSL 1.0.2 will however still be supported for another 5 years
>> with v17 (which is ~9years past its EOL date) so I don't feel too bad about it.
>
> Is anything -- other than this inquiry -- preventing this patch set from
> getting committed?
The overwhelming consensus seemed to be "just do it", so FWIW consider
my reservations withdrawn ;-)
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-08-21 14:52:03 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-08-21 14:43:19 | Re: configure failures on chipmunk |