Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func
Date: 2024-08-20 08:53:24
Message-ID: ZsRZhEm-tTQeLyYy@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> +1. There's also a prototype for _PG_fini() in fmgr.h, let's remove that
> too.

Yes, I was wondering too whether we should force the hand of
extensions to know that it is pointless to support unloading, telling
everybody to delete this code.

I'm OK with the agressive move and remove the whole. Any thoughts
from others?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-08-20 08:59:45 Re: race condition in pg_class
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-08-20 08:47:57 Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR