From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR |
Date: | 2024-08-20 08:47:57 |
Message-ID: | ZsRYPcOtoqbWzjGG@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 02:11:55PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I made the changes for pg_tblspc in pg_combinebackup.c as the number of occurences
> are greater that the "pg_wal" ones and we were to define PG_TBLSPC_DIR in any
> case.
>
> Please find attached the related patches.
No real objection about the replslot and pg_logical bits.
- * $PGDATA/pg_tblspc/spcoid/PG_MAJORVER_CATVER/dboid/relfilenumber
+ * $PGDATA/PG_TBLSPC_DIR/spcoid/PG_MAJORVER_CATVER/dboid/relfilenumber
For the tablespace parts, I am not sure that I would update the
comments to reflect the variables, TBH. Somebody reading the comments
would need to refer back to pg_tblspc/ in the header.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-08-20 08:53:24 | Re: Remaining reference to _PG_fini() in ldap_password_func |
Previous Message | 陈宗志 | 2024-08-20 08:46:37 | Some questions about PostgreSQL’s design. |