From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |
Date: | 2024-05-14 00:56:26 |
Message-ID: | ZkK2uqJ-m_2WgLWR@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:24:39AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 5/11/24 09:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 23:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I looked at both of these. In both cases I didn't see why the user
> > > > would need to know these changes were made:
> > >
> > > I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
> > > the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
> > > is user-visible. People might have internalized the fact that
> > > it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.
> >
> > The buffering change improved performance up to ~40% in some of the
> > benchmarks. The case it improves mostly is COPY of large rows and
> > streaming a base backup. That sounds user-visible enough to me to
> > warrant an entry imho.
>
> +1
Attached patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
master.diff | text/x-diff | 1.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-05-14 00:59:42 | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-05-14 00:38:47 | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |