Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-05-14 00:56:26
Message-ID: ZkK2uqJ-m_2WgLWR@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:24:39AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 5/11/24 09:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 23:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I looked at both of these. In both cases I didn't see why the user
> > > > would need to know these changes were made:
> > >
> > > I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
> > > the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
> > > is user-visible. People might have internalized the fact that
> > > it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.
> >
> > The buffering change improved performance up to ~40% in some of the
> > benchmarks. The case it improves mostly is COPY of large rows and
> > streaming a base backup. That sounds user-visible enough to me to
> > warrant an entry imho.
>
> +1

Attached patch applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment Content-Type Size
master.diff text/x-diff 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-14 00:59:42 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-05-14 00:38:47 Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?