Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-05-11 14:24:39
Message-ID: 6233479a-0e58-464c-8ff1-311e076a9c00@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/11/24 09:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 23:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> > I looked at both of these. In both cases I didn't see why the user
>> > would need to know these changes were made:
>>
>> I agree that the buffering change is not likely interesting, but
>> the fact that you can now control-C out of a psql "\c" command
>> is user-visible. People might have internalized the fact that
>> it didn't work, or created complicated workarounds.
>
> The buffering change improved performance up to ~40% in some of the
> benchmarks. The case it improves mostly is COPY of large rows and
> streaming a base backup. That sounds user-visible enough to me to
> warrant an entry imho.

+1

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-05-11 15:33:27 Re: Document NULL
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-05-11 13:57:49 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes