Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-05-14 12:20:24
Message-ID: CAGECzQSFA47rzPSgRcezfJdBOtTwEF0oCNsh_gKDkXDCCZVWXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 02:56, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:24:39AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > On 5/11/24 09:57, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> > > The buffering change improved performance up to ~40% in some of the
> > > benchmarks. The case it improves mostly is COPY of large rows and
> > > streaming a base backup. That sounds user-visible enough to me to
> > > warrant an entry imho.
> >
> > +1
>
> Attached patch applied.

I think we shouldn't list this under the libpq changes and shouldn't
mention libpq in the description, since this patch changes
src/backend/libpq files instead of src/interfaces/libpq files. I think
it should be in the "General performance" section and describe the
change as something like the below:

Improve performance when transferring large blocks of data to a client

PS. I completely understand that this was not clear from the commit message.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-05-14 13:17:51 Re: explain format json, unit for serialize and memory are different.
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-05-14 12:04:46 RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR