On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 02:49:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Thanks for looking. I noticed that the version check is unnecessary since
>> we always use the new binary's pg_dump[all], so I removed that in v2.
>
> +1
+1. Could there be an argument in favor of a backpatch? This is a
performance improvement, but one could also side that the addition of
sync support in pg_dump[all] has made that a regression that we'd
better fix because the flushes don't matter in this context. They
also bring costs for no gain.
--
Michael