Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types
Date: 2024-05-09 00:01:16
Message-ID: 20240509000116.GB3212918@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:57:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Agreed. Another option could be to just annotate the arguments with the
>> parameter names.
>
> At the call sites you mean? Sure, I can do that.

Yes.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-05-09 00:03:56 Re: add --no-sync to pg_upgrade's calls to pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-08 23:57:55 Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types