Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi(dot)zeeshan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vidyashree H S <Shreevidya(dot)hs(at)exaleapsemi(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster
Date: 2024-05-09 23:23:07
Message-ID: Zj1a2_OKjZMS-gTU@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 06:33:39PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Multimaster
>
>
> That is a pretty old page. There are other solutions, such as pgedge, but the
> three most important questions when it comes to active-active replication are:
>
> * Do you really, really need it? (hint: the answer is no)
> * What problem are you trying to solve?
> * Are you really willing to suffer the tradeoffs?

Agreed, see this:

https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2018.html#December_24_2018

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message yudhi s 2024-05-10 04:33:40 Question on roles and privileges
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2024-05-09 22:33:39 Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster