Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi(dot)zeeshan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vidyashree H S <Shreevidya(dot)hs(at)exaleapsemi(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster
Date: 2024-05-09 22:33:39
Message-ID: CAKAnmmKX9wV1HTnMNnwQ9bpKZb4863+33r4UC7UD2dLiTAV77Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Multimaster
>

That is a pretty old page. There are other solutions, such as pgedge, but
the three most important questions when it comes to active-active
replication are:

* Do you really, really need it? (hint: the answer is no)
* What problem are you trying to solve?
* Are you really willing to suffer the tradeoffs?

Cheers,
Greg

P.S. Please upgrade to v15.7

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-09 23:23:07 Re: Postgresql active-active nodes in cluster
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-05-09 16:45:13 Re: Unexpected data when subscribing to logical replication slot