Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass
Date: 2023-07-03 00:22:58
Message-ID: ZKIU4mhWpgJOM0W0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 08:25:34AM +0000, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass
>
> Move the calculation of Bloom filter parameters (for BRIN indexes) into
> a separate function to make reuse easier. At the moment we only call it
> from one place, but that may change and it's easier to read anyway.
>
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0e1f3350-c9cf-ab62-43a5-5dae314de89c%40enterprisedb.com

koel has failed its indent step after these commits. I am unsure
whether you need to fix this as it does not seem that we have a
consensus to automate that, just FYI.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-07-03 00:30:10 Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-07-02 23:29:21 pgsql: Silence "missing contrecord" error.