Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass
Date: 2023-07-03 00:30:10
Message-ID: 229983.1688344210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> koel has failed its indent step after these commits. I am unsure
> whether you need to fix this as it does not seem that we have a
> consensus to automate that, just FYI.

Well, *somebody* has to fix it, otherwise why did we set up the animal?
But the impression I had was that a majority of committers want to
start keeping the tree pgindent-clean.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-07-03 00:50:04 pgsql: Remove redundant PARTITION BY columns from WindowClauses
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-03 00:22:58 Re: pgsql: Introduce bloom_filter_size for BRIN bloom opclass