Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
Date: 2025-02-19 01:12:48
Message-ID: Z7UwEEbiuV0m6PJR@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> The spam filtering[1] that occurs for the header information appears to
> >> have been applied to the bottom link as well - making it 404. Not sure
> >> where that is getting applied, but doing a "raw source" and checking my
> >> original inbox seems to indicate the link at the bottom of the email was
> >> sent unobscured.
>
> > FWIW I confirm that I did send a valid / unobscured link.
>
> IME the trick to keeping this from happening is to manually convert
> any "@" characters in the URL you send to "%40". Usually if you
> copy-and-paste from your browser address bar that happens for free.

That's what I usually do. I guess that time I just copied the link from some
email header.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-02-19 03:01:08 Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-02-19 00:51:01 Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?