Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
Date: 2025-02-19 03:01:08
Message-ID: CAKAnmmJFPfDB4C=PJKwV_u_cDu=2LxDjs70q=k0bWOiupfToUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Yes, but surely our script can be taught that \bhttps://\S* should be
excluded from the munging?

Secondarily, maybe make the web server smart enough to undo and redirect
the (and) (at) stuff that would otherwise be 404?

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maciek Sakrejda 2025-02-19 18:05:21 Broken layout: CommitFest Add Review Form (still)
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2025-02-19 01:12:48 Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?