| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |
| Date: | 2025-02-19 00:51:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1835331.1739926261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The spam filtering[1] that occurs for the header information appears to
>> have been applied to the bottom link as well - making it 404. Not sure
>> where that is getting applied, but doing a "raw source" and checking my
>> original inbox seems to indicate the link at the bottom of the email was
>> sent unobscured.
> FWIW I confirm that I did send a valid / unobscured link.
IME the trick to keeping this from happening is to manually convert
any "@" characters in the URL you send to "%40". Usually if you
copy-and-paste from your browser address bar that happens for free.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2025-02-19 01:12:48 | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2025-02-19 00:07:34 | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |