On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 08:23:46AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:15:52AM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>> But I agree that having a macro has more benefits,
>> also there already is a check for the 'io_op < IOOP_NUM_TYPES' in the
>> pgstat_count_io_op() function.
>
> Yeah, I think we can remove the "io_op < IOOP_NUM_TYPE" assertion in
> pgstat_count_io_op() (but keep this check as part of the macro).
>
> Appart from the above, LGTM.
Okay, so applied.
And I've somewhat managed to fat-finger the business with
pgstat_count_io_op() with an incorrect rebase. Will remove in a
minute..
--
Michael