| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL-logging facility for pgstats kinds |
| Date: | 2025-01-14 03:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | Z4Xf_KHTv_B-5GtF@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 01:46:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'd rather use RecoveryInProgress() here even if XLogInsertAllowed()
> is a synonym of that, minus the update of LocalXLogInsertAllowed for
> the local process.
I've applied v2-0002 for the new header as it is useful on its own.
Rebased to avoid the wrath of the CF bot, as v3.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0003-Add-RMGR-and-WAL-logging-API-for-pgstats.patch | text/x-diff | 11.1 KB |
| v3-0004-injection_points-Add-option-and-tests-for-WAL-log.patch | text/x-diff | 7.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2025-01-14 04:03:00 | Re: Issue with markers in isolation tester? Or not? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-01-14 03:18:23 | Re: Make pg_stat_io view count IOs as bytes instead of blocks |