Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()
Date: 2024-12-11 00:01:24
Message-ID: Z1jWVDu6SPkAZ2K3@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:54:23AM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Hi, there is a CF entry for this -- is it ready to mark committed?

Oops. I've missed that there was an entry in CF 51. Updated that
now. Thanks for the poke.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-11 00:22:06 Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 23:55:11 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication