Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date: 2024-12-10 23:55:11
Message-ID: Z1jU34P0gmJjxquX@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:50:16PM -0800, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Sorry I lost track of this thread. I'll check the test results and
> patch soon.

Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-11 00:01:24 Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()
Previous Message John Naylor 2024-12-10 23:54:23 Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()