Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()

From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fix deprecation mention for age() and mxid_age()
Date: 2024-12-10 23:54:23
Message-ID: CANWCAZYNdvcMBoS9TOe4au=qVVWbnx97QKRtVjQTR=bsNTbNhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:23 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 06:52:40AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Done. The section mistake in REL_16_STABLE was.. Interesting.

Hi, there is a CF entry for this -- is it ready to mark committed?

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 23:55:11 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-10 23:45:23 Re: [18] Fix a few issues with the collation cache