Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erki Eessaar <erki(dot)eessaar(at)taltech(dot)ee>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely
Date: 2022-09-01 01:11:52
Message-ID: YxAG2DFuSVDcQMn9@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:34:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I have written the attached patch to mention this issue about sql_body
> > > functions.
> >
> > Spell-check, please. Seems OK otherwise.
>
> Just when I think I didn't add enough text to warrant a spell check.
> :-( Updated patch attached.

Patch applied back to PG 10. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-09-01 02:21:17 Re: nicer examples for aggregate calls
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2022-09-01 00:27:53 Re: set time zone