Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erki Eessaar <erki(dot)eessaar(at)taltech(dot)ee>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely
Date: 2022-09-08 11:20:31
Message-ID: a2dc9de4-24fc-3222-87d3-0def8057d7d8@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 01.09.22 03:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:34:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>> I have written the attached patch to mention this issue about sql_body
>>>> functions.
>>>
>>> Spell-check, please. Seems OK otherwise.
>>
>> Just when I think I didn't add enough text to warrant a spell check.
>> :-( Updated patch attached.
>
> Patch applied back to PG 10. Thanks.

This feature is new in PG 14, so backpatching further than that doesn't
make sense.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message found not 2022-09-08 15:33:01 Developer FAQ Dead Link
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-09-08 08:01:45 Re: PL/pgSQL casing