Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erki Eessaar <erki(dot)eessaar(at)taltech(dot)ee>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely
Date: 2022-08-16 19:38:13
Message-ID: YvvyJTmSbPLKUm5k@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:34:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have written the attached patch to mention this issue about sql_body
> > functions.
>
> Spell-check, please. Seems OK otherwise.

Just when I think I didn't add enough text to warrant a spell check.
:-( Updated patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

Attachment Content-Type Size
function.diff text/x-diff 913 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erwin Brandstetter 2022-08-16 21:09:59 Confusing bit in the "EXAMPLES" section for INSERT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-16 19:34:22 Re: SQL-standard function bodies and creating SECURITY DEFINER routines securely