Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication.
Date: 2022-01-08 09:25:17
Message-ID: YdlYfS/l+PQA0ehs@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:22:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 2) crake fails perl-check
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2022-01-08%2002%3A47%3A26
>
> All the failures are the same, because of the shape of the subroutine
> definitions:
> Jan 07 21:53:04 ./src/test/subscription/t/027_nosuperuser.pl:
> Subroutine prototypes used at line 13, column 1. See page 194 of
> PBP. ([Subroutines::ProhibitSubroutinePrototypes] Severity: 5)

This issue is just caused by the way the subroutines are defined,
meaning that the attached cools down pgperlcritic. Any objections if
I apply that to cool down crake? Jeff, if you wish to do so, please
feel free of course.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
crake-perlcritic.patch text/x-diff 2.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-01-08 16:30:57 Re: pgsql: Respect permissions within logical replication.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-08 07:46:02 pgsql: Fix issues with describe queries of extended statistics in psql