Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings
Date: 2021-04-22 11:12:25
Message-ID: YIFaGaU3RqGPPKJA@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:56:28PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> My understanding is that it's the project standard. See e.g.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1730584.1617836485@sss.pgh.pa.us

FWIW, I am not questioning the format of the specifiers, which is
something I heard about, but the casts used on the values passed down
:)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-04-22 11:16:04 Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2021-04-22 11:00:38 Re: multirange constructor strictness