| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings |
| Date: | 2021-04-22 11:16:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20210422111604.5p7cwjrdcc3w2eou@nol |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 08:12:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:56:28PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > My understanding is that it's the project standard. See e.g.
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1730584.1617836485@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> FWIW, I am not questioning the format of the specifiers, which is
> something I heard about, but the casts used on the values passed down
> :)
Because uint64 can be unsigned long int or unsigned long long int depending on
the platform?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-04-22 11:20:59 | RE: Parallel INSERT SELECT take 2 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-22 11:12:25 | Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings |