Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INT64_FORMAT in translatable strings
Date: 2021-04-22 10:56:28
Message-ID: 20210422105628.s3gis6w5hjvo34xb@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 07:49:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> May I ask why you are using "unsigned long long int" rather uint64?

My understanding is that it's the project standard. See e.g.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1730584.1617836485@sss.pgh.pa.us

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2021-04-22 11:00:38 Re: multirange constructor strictness
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-22 10:54:54 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings