Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date: 2023-02-02 02:14:39
Message-ID: Y9scj72hYZns5/eY@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 10:06:15AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks for confirming. I am wondering what these animals may complain
> about next, but based on some tests on this buildfarm host with the
> same configuration, things are looking OK once this stuff is applied
> on 11~14.

Actually, I completely forgot to take into account that there is a
minor release planned for next week:
https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/

So I'll hold on a bit longer here, until the next versions get their
tags.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-02 02:34:44 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-02 02:06:19 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15