| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15 |
| Date: | 2023-02-02 02:34:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1449633.1675305284@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Hmm. Isn't that something that we should also document in startup.c
> where both routines are defined? If we begin to use
> PreRestoreCommand() and PostRestoreCommand() in more code paths in the
> future, that could be again an issue.
I was vaguely wondering about removing both of those functions
in favor of an integrated function that does a system() call
with those things before and after it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-02-02 03:03:46 | Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-02 02:14:39 | Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux? |