Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date: 2023-02-02 01:06:15
Message-ID: Y9sMhxo51HRXAmtu@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:06:16PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> +1, go for it. It shouldn't affect Unix build releases, and on
> Windows the function does nothing.

Thanks for confirming. I am wondering what these animals may complain
about next, but based on some tests on this buildfarm host with the
same configuration, things are looking OK once this stuff is applied
on 11~14.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-02 01:12:12 Re: CI and test improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-02 01:03:10 Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning