Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

From: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
To: (Jan Wieck) <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, kar(at)webline(dot)dk
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Date: 1999-06-08 10:51:10
Message-ID: XFMail.990608145110.dms@wplus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08-Jun-99 Jan Wieck wrote:
> Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
>
>>
>> > If there's (only one) Perl PROGRAMMER out in the world
>> > reading this, who does see a (however small) possibility to
>> > explain how to integrate a Perl interpreter into PostgreSQL,
>> > RESPOND!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> Well I'm a Perl programmer. I don't have a clue about how to integrate
>> Perl into PostgreSQL, but it should be possible.
>>
>> I'd like to help. I know Perl, but nothing about the internals of
>> PostgreSQL and I don't code C.
>
> That's the point and why I wrote programmer in capitals (REAL
> PROGRAMMERS STILL THINK AND TALK IN CAPITALS). It's not Perl
> script-writing what's needed at this stage. We need
> programmers that are familiar with the C API of Perl and
> could easily write things like the Pg package. And that's
> still not enough knowledge.

Ok!
I have no problems writing C package like Pg.pm to use with Perl 5.x.

However, IMHO all tasks requiring such packages
can better be done using C++ and STL.

---
Dmitry Samersoff, dms(at)wplus(dot)net, ICQ:3161705
http://devnull.wplus.net
* There will come soft rains ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maarten Boekhold 1999-06-08 13:49:22 Re: [HACKERS] PID of backend
Previous Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-06-08 10:40:39 Re: [HACKERS] PL/Lang (was: Priorities for 6.6)