| From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Date: | 2018-10-23 21:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.74.f8747b02b8d5321a.166a2d78056@tc7-visena |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
På tirsdag 23. oktober 2018 kl. 22:45:36, skrev Adrian Klaver <
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>:
On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Well it is Aurora.
>
>
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
>
Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed
databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either direction.
Is it so hard to accept commercial databases have advantages?
I find that not one bit surprising.
I've used PG since 90's and it's no secret the "big guys" beat PG on certain
workloads.
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-10-23 21:36:29 | Re: Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Previous Message | Jerry Sievers | 2018-10-23 21:05:46 | Re: Oracle vs PG |