Re: Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG

On 10/23/18 2:34 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> På tirsdag 23. oktober 2018 kl. 22:45:36, skrev Adrian Klaver
> <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>:
>
> On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> > Well it is Aurora.
> >
> >
> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
> >
>
> Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
> side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed
> databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either
> direction.
>
> Is it so hard to accept commercial databases have advantages?

That is entirely possible. My point is that the article does not contain
enough information to make that determination. As with many media
articles it was written to support the headline, not to actually shed
light on the issue.

> I find that not one bit surprising.
> I've used PG since 90's and it's no secret the "big guys" beat PG on
> certain workloads.
> --
> Andreas Joseph Krogh
> ​

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com