| From: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)aol(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Date: | 2018-10-23 21:05:46 |
| Message-ID: | 87bm7kpe51.fsf@jsievers.enova.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
>
>> Well it is Aurora.
>>
>> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
>>
>
> Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
> side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon
> changed databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in
> either direction.
Yeah and kudos to them for taking a chance.
I assume what revenue they lost during the incident will be made back
thousands of times over when/if they can avoid paying what it likely an
absurd cost to licence the $big-commercial-db.
FWIW
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 312.241.7800
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2018-10-23 21:34:09 | Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-10-23 20:55:24 | Re: Oracle vs PG |