Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 15:26:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0505041724340.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide
> "per directory user restrictions"? Where I could give CVS access to
> Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory?

Just how many incidents where people change the wrong files do you except.
Maybe it's just easier to handle one such case every third year than to
set up some system to prevent it.

--
/Dennis Björklund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-04 15:35:02 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-04 15:02:33 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement