Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 15:35:02
Message-ID: 4278EBA6.1070105@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
>>Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide
>>"per directory user restrictions"? Where I could give CVS access to
>>Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory?
>
>
> Just how many incidents where people change the wrong files do you except.
> Maybe it's just easier to handle one such case every third year than to
> set up some system to prevent it.

The number of incidents isn't the issue, the fact that it could happen
at all is.

This isn't a web browser. This is a system that companies, very - very
big companies rely on. We must have a controlled, documented process for
comitters.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-04 15:46:30 Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-05-04 15:26:29 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement