From: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-04 16:11:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0505041804070.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Just how many incidents where people change the wrong files do you except.
> > Maybe it's just easier to handle one such case every third year than to
> > set up some system to prevent it.
>
> The number of incidents isn't the issue, the fact that it could happen
> at all is.
>
> This isn't a web browser.
Du you have anything against browsers? :-)
> This is a system that companies, very - very big companies rely on. We
> must have a controlled, documented process for comitters.
And?
If you tell someone he/she is just allowed to commit in the pl/foo
subproject then that's probably more then enough. The nice thing with cvs
is that old things are not lost and all the commits are sent out on a
mailinglist. I don't see how this is any different just because some very
- very big companies are involved.
If it's easy to do, fine. I just don't see it as a very important thing.
Anyway. I think it's a good thing that postgresql do as little as possible
and stuff that can be handled separately are.
--
/Dennis Björklund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-04 16:27:11 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-04 15:46:41 | Re: Regression tests |