| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-04 14:48:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20050504114704.Y53065@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>> As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
>>> time to replace it.
>>>
>>
>> CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
>> matter in hand. What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
>> sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.
>>
>>
> I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were
> driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-)
Just curious here ... but do any of the version control systems provide
"per directory user restrictions"? Where I could give CVS access to
Joshua, for instance, just to the plphp directory?
Serious question here, since I don't know, I only know CVS can't (or,
rather, not that I've ever been able to find in the docs) ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-04 14:51:01 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-04 14:46:42 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |