Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 14:51:01
Message-ID: 20050504114928.C53065@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 4 May 2005, Dave Cramer wrote:

>> 2) As long as we're using CVS, the only way to organize autonomous project
>> teams that have authority over their special areas but no ability to change
>> central code is to "push out" projects to separate CVS trees.
>>
> This has never been an issue before, AFAIK, nobody with commit privliges
> in a separate package has ever changed the code where they weren't
> supposed to.

It isn't so much that as allowing 'project teams' arbitrarily
adding/removing their own committers, instead of having "one central
committer for a project" that everything went through ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-04 14:53:51 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-04 14:48:07 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement