From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 09:22:33 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311181017150.3317-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page writes:
> Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them seen to think
> that it's important for expanding our userbase:
> http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9
That survey is a bit like asking television viewers, "What do you think
would attract the most new television viewers?"
33% -- better entertainment
That does not say that better entertainment will attract new viewers, just
that the existing viewers think that. Most nonviewers might in fact be
perfectly content with their way of living.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-18 09:45:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-18 08:22:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2003-11-18 09:40:24 | Re: Background writer process |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 09:15:13 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |